Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4
Which model is better? Compare pricing, capabilities, and performance.
Quick Verdict
GPT-5.4 wins on raw performance and multimodal capabilities; Llama 4 Maverick wins on openness, privacy, and customization freedom.
| Category | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Openai |
| Input Price | $1.50/M★ | $2.50/M |
| Output Price | $4.50/M★ | $15.00/M |
| Context Window | 262,144 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 16,384 | 32,768★ |
| Coding Score | 86 | 92★ |
| Reasoning Score | 84 | 90★ |
| Speed Score | 70 | 80★ |
| Modalities | text, image | text, image, audio, video |
| Latency | medium | fast |
| Rate Limit | 1,500 RPM | 8,000 RPM |
Detailed Analysis
Llama 4 Maverick and GPT-5.4 represent two fundamentally different philosophies in AI: open-source freedom vs proprietary polish.
GPT-5.4 delivers superior raw performance with a coding score of 92 vs Maverick's 86, reasoning at 90 vs 84, and full multimodal support including video and audio input. Its ecosystem of tools, documentation, and community resources is unmatched. For teams that want the most capable model with the least friction, GPT-5.4 is the straightforward choice.
Llama 4 Maverick, however, offers something GPT-5.4 cannot: complete freedom. As a fully open-weight model, Maverick can be self-hosted on private infrastructure, fine-tuned on proprietary data, and customized without restrictions. For organizations with strict data privacy requirements or those building specialized AI applications, this openness is transformative.
At $1.50/$4.50 per million tokens through API providers, Maverick is also significantly cheaper than GPT-5.4 at $2.50/$15. For high-volume applications, these savings compound rapidly.
The choice ultimately comes down to your priorities: maximum capability and convenience (GPT-5.4) or maximum freedom and privacy (Llama 4 Maverick).
Llama 4 Maverick Pros
- +Fully open-weight — self-host, fine-tune, and customize
- +Better privacy and data security
- +Lower cost at scale
Llama 4 Maverick Cons
- −Lower benchmark scores across the board
- −No audio or video input support
- −Requires infrastructure for self-hosting
GPT-5.4 Pros
- +Superior coding and reasoning performance
- +Full multimodal support (video, audio, text)
- +Mature ecosystem and developer tools
GPT-5.4 Cons
- −Proprietary — cannot self-host or customize
- −Data processed through OpenAI cloud
- −Higher per-token pricing
Frequently Asked Questions
Summary
When choosing between Llama 4 Maverick and GPT-5.4, consider your specific needs. GPT-5.4 wins on raw performance and multimodal capabilities; Llama 4 Maverick wins on openness, privacy, and customization freedom.We recommend reviewing the full comparison table above and considering your budget, required context window, and primary use case before making a decision.